REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. EFREN S. BUENAVENTURA. [G.R. No. 198629. April 05, 2022]
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. EFREN S. BUENAVENTURA, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 198629. April 05, 2022]
Bar Chair Reading Hub
2026 Bar Chair Cases
A focused repository of Bar Chair cases and related readings, organized for steady review and easier retrieval.
Recommended Reading
Daily Bar Chair Case
Start with one highlighted case, then continue with the full repository below.
Today's Recommended
LABASTIDA vs. QUIRES,** [G.R. No. 251903. January 27, 2025]
DOCTRINE Proof of service of the assailed judgment must be clearly established to properly determine the reckoning period for filing an appeal. To this end, the registry return receipt alone will not suffice to prove service through registered mail. In the same vein, the disputable presumptions that the postal officers regularly performed their duties or that letters duly directed and mailed were received in the regular course of mail, do not apply in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. FACTS This resolves the Petition for Review on Certiorari[1]...
Case Repository
Full Bar Chair Case Repository
Search and browse the curated list of cases connected to the current Bar Chair category.
ABS-CBN CORPORATION VS. CLARA L. MAGNO [G.R. No. 203876. March 29, 2022]
ABS-CBN CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. CLARA L. MAGNO, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 203876. March 29, 2022]
FELICITAS AGUILAR BOLLOZOS VS. HEIRS OF LUISA ABRIO VDA. DE AGUILAR. [G.R. No. 194310. March 29, 2022]
FELICITAS AGUILAR BOLLOZOS, PETITIONER, VS. HEIRS OF LUISA ABRIO VDA. DE AGUILAR REPRESENTED BY FLORENTINO DIPUTADO, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 194310. March 29, 2022]
OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN VS. LILAH YMBONG RODAS. [G.R. No. 225669. March 23, 2022]
OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. LILAH YMBONG RODAS, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 225669. March 23, 2022]
RURAL BANK OF CANDELARIA VS. ROMULO BANLUTA. [G.R. No. 208254. March 23, 2022]
RURAL BANK OF CANDELARIA (ZAMBALES), INC. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN-PRESIDENT, ANTONIO MANIKAN, PETITIONER, VS. ROMULO BANLUTA (DECEASED), SUBSTITUTED BY HIS CHILDREN, NAMELY: ROMULO BANLUTA, JR., ET AL., RESPONDENT....
LOURDES CHENG VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES [G.R. No. 207373. March 23, 2022]
LOURDES CHENG, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT [G.R. No. 207373. March 23, 2022]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. LORENZO MAYOGBA CEREZO AND EDWIN GODINEZ CASTILLO [G.R. No. 252173. March 15, 2022]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LORENZO MAYOGBA CEREZO AND EDWIN GODINEZ CASTILLO, ACCUSED [G.R. No. 252173. March 15, 2022]
PSI DARWIN D. VALDERAS VS. VILMA O. SULSE. [G.R. No. 205659. March 09, 2022]
PSI DARWIN D. VALDERAS, PETITIONER, VS. VILMA O. SULSE, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 205659. March 09, 2022]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. RUFINO RAMOY AND DENNIS PADILLA. [G.R. No. 212738. March 09, 2022]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, ATTY. ANNA LIZA R. JUAN-BARRAMEDA, MISCHAELLA SAVARI, AND MARLON SAVARI, PETITIONERS, VS. RUFINO RAMOY AND DENNIS PADILLA, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 212738. March 09, 2022]
ATTY. ROBERTO F. DE LEON VS. LOURDES S. ASOMBRADO-LLACUNA. [G.R. No. 246127. March 02, 2022]
ATTY. ROBERTO F. DE LEON, PETITIONER, VS. LOURDES S. ASOMBRADO-LLACUNA, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 246127. March 02, 2022]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. XXX. [G.R. No. 254254. February 16, 2022]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. XXX,[1]ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [G.R. No. 254254. February 16, 2022]
OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN VS. TEODORA T. HERMOSURA. [G.R. No. 207606. February 16, 2022]
OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. TEODORA T. HERMOSURA, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 207606. February 16, 2022]
